FindTrial
Sign In

False-Negative Analysis of Different Fungal Detection Methods in Bloodstream Fungal Infections and Its Effect on the Timeliness of Antifungal Therapy

False-Negative Analysis of Different Fungal Detection Methods in Bloodstream Fungal Infections and Its Effect on the Timeliness of Antifungal Therapy

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2600124837
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2026-05-18
Start date
2026-05-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-05-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bloodstream fungal infection

Interventions

G Experimental group, GM experimental group, Cryptococcal antigen analysis group and mNGS group:None

Sponsors

The First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Complete clinical data are available, and blood culture indicates fungal infection. 2. Corresponding fungal etiological tests (such as G/GM test, cryptococcal antigen analysis, mNGS, etc.) were performed within the same period (+/-24 hours) as the blood culture submission.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Medical records are severely incomplete, making it impossible to evaluate clinical indications, treatment regimens, or outcomes.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Blood culture;(1,3)-ß-D-glucan;Galactomannan;Cryptococcus Antigen;Metagenomics Next-Generation Sequencing;—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactLü Huajie

The First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University

1210707650@qq.com+86 23 6876 5611

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 30, 2026