Skip to content

A Clinical Study on the Risk Prediction Model for Poor Postoperative Functional Improvement After Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

A Clinical Study on the Risk Prediction Model for Poor Postoperative Functional Improvement After Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2600124326
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2026-05-11
Start date
2026-05-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-05-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Degenerative Lumbar Diseases

Interventions

Observation group:N/A

Sponsors

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Age >=18 years; 2.Definitive diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis with failure of standardized conservative treatment and remaining surgical indications; 3.Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) findings consistent with clinical symptoms and signs; 4.Undergoing unilateral bilateral endoscopic lumbar decompression surgery (UBELD); 5.Postoperative follow-up duration of no less than 3 months with complete clinical data, imaging data, and follow-up records.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patients with grade III or higher pars interarticularis fissure-related spondylolisthesis, coronal Cobb angle =20°, or other significant lumbar instability; 2.Previous lumbar surgery at the same segment requiring revision; 3.Concurrent severe spinal conditions such as lumbar fractures, infections, tumors, or ankylosing spondylitis; 4.Associated neurodegenerative disorders including Alzheimer's disease or Parkinson's disease; 5.Inadequate follow-up or incomplete clinical data. According to the original study, during outcome evaluation, cases of structural failure due to recurrent stenosis or insufficient decompression, as well as those failing to meet minimal clinically important differences (MCID) due to preoperative overly low objective disability index (ODI), were excluded from the slow functional improvement assessment to minimize bias and enhance study population homogeneity.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Minimal Clinically Important Difference;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score for Lumbar Spine;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactYimin Wu

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University

tomwucom@sina.com+86 173 3680 5409

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 22, 2026