Skip to content

Analgesic Effect of a Novel Non-pharmacological Electrical Signal-Based Analgesic Device versus Intravenous Flurbiprofen Axetil on Burn Donor Sites: A Prospective, Single-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study

Analgesic Effect of a Novel Non-pharmacological Electrical Signal-Based Analgesic Device versus Intravenous Flurbiprofen Axetil on Burn Donor Sites: A Prospective, Single-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2600123898
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2026-04-30
Start date
2026-05-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-05-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Burn

Interventions

Trial Group:Novel non-pharmacological electrical signal analgesic device (single-use sterile dressing) directly applied to the donor site wound and sealed.
Control Group:Self-adhesive soft silicone foam dressing Mepilex directly applied to the donor site wound, combined with intravenous flurbiprofen axetil (loading dose: 50mg slow IV push
maintenance dose: 100mg every 12 hours IV infusion).

Sponsors

Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Donor site area for burn skin grafting is less than 20% of total body surface area (TBSA); 2. Presence of pain at the donor site following burn skin grafting, with a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score or Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score >= 5; 3. Age between 18 and 65 years, inclusive, regardless of gender; 4. Body mass index (BMI) between 18.5 and 27.9; 5. The patient or authorized representative has been informed of the study and has provided a signed and dated informed consent form; 6. Commitment to comply with the study procedures and cooperate throughout the full course of the study;

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Occurrence of severe adverse drug reactions; 2. Concomitant use of psychotropic or sedative medications known to affect pain perception; 3. History of psychiatric illness or altered consciousness rendering the patient unable to cooperate; 4. Presence of severe organ dysfunction (e.g., cardiovascular or cerebrovascular accident within the preceding 3 months, malignancy, severe hepatic or renal insufficiency); 5. Extensive burns complicated by severe infection or shock; presence of inhalation injury requiring tracheotomy and mechanical ventilation; 6. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status classification of Grade IV or inability to survive beyond 24 hours despite treatment; 7. Refusal by the patient or authorized representative to sign the informed consent form;

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change from baseline in resting pain NRS score;Change from baseline in procedural pain NRS score;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Time to achieve a decrease of more than 2 points in VAS pain score from baseline across groups;Percentage change in pain intensity (SPID24 and SPID48);Healing time of donor site (time to 95% re-epithelialization);Incidence rate of drug-related adverse reactions (nausea, vomiting, gastrointestinal bleeding, dizziness, somnolence);Degree of reduction in inflammatory cytokine concentrations (TNF-a, IL-1ß) in wound exudate at donor site;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactLiu Yan

Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

rjliuyan@126.com+86 21 64370045

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 7, 2026