Skip to content

The efficacy and safety of sequential 595nm pulse dye laser versus long pulse 1064nm Nd: YAG laser treatment of non-thick wine spots: A prospective, self-segmental controlled trial

The efficacy and safety of sequential 595nm pulse dye laser versus long pulse 1064nm Nd: YAG laser treatment of non-thick wine spots: A prospective, self-segmental controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2600122419
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2026-04-14
Start date
2026-04-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-04-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Port-wine CM

Interventions

Control side:General 595nm PDL
Test side:Sequential 595nm+1064nm treatment

Sponsors

Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
No minimum to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients with untreated PWS; 2. Age >= 1 month; 3. Non-obese-type lesions; 4. Patients or their guardians voluntarily sign informed consent, are willing to accept the trial, and cooperate with follow-up after fully understanding the treatment plan and risks.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Proliferative or nodular PWS; 2. Amalgamated other vascular abnormalities; 3. Photosensitivity history or on photosensitive medication; 4. Pregnant or breastfeeding women; 5. Patients participating in other clinical trials.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Subjective Visual Evaluation Score;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Objective evaluation of photometers;Safety Assessment;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactLin Xiaoxi

Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine

linxiaoxi@126.com+86 13701997136

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 23, 2026