FindTrial
Sign In

Comparative Study on the Biomechanical Characteristics of Landing Cushioning under Different Recovery Methods after Fatigue Induction

Comparative Study on the Biomechanical Characteristics of Landing Cushioning under Different Recovery Methods after Fatigue Induction

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2600121927
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2026-04-07
Start date
2026-04-08
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-04-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

none

Interventions

Experimental group:To compare the effects of different recovery methods within each participant, each participant completed three independent fatigue-induction and recovery-intervention sessions, each
(B) low-intensity cycling
or (C) foam rolling.

Sponsors

Guangzhou Sport University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Male

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: (1) In good health, without cardiovascular, lung, or other chronic diseases; (2) Having more than 2 years of resistance training experience; (3) Without bad habits such as heavy drinking;

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: (1) Low compliance; (2) Lost to follow-up due to injury or withdrawal; (3) Failure to cooperate.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Peak Vertical Ground Reaction Force;Leg stiffness;Vertical Loading Rate;Heart rate;—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Subjective fatigue level;—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactDuanying Li

Guangzhou Sport University

duanyingli123@163.com+86 158 2026 5799

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 17, 2026