Skip to content

Fine-tuning Study of Epilepsy Diagnosis and Treatment Models for Neurological Diseases

Fine-tuning Study of Epilepsy Diagnosis and Treatment Models for Neurological Diseases

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2600121828
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2026-04-03
Start date
2026-03-09
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-04-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Epilepsy

Interventions

Gold Standard:Diagnosed with epilepsy according to the 2017 ILAE diagnostic criteria
Index test:Cross-validation was performed on the internal validation set, and prospective validation was conducted on the external multi-center cohort.

Sponsors

Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
14 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Retrospective inclusion criteria: (1) Age 14 years and older; (2) Patients diagnosed with epilepsy. 2. Prospective inclusion criteria: (1) Age 14 years and older; (2) Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of epilepsy; (3) Patients or their legal guardians able to understand the study content and provide informed consent; (4) Clinically stable condition and able to comply with the study procedures.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Exclusion criteria for the retrospective study: (1) Information cannot be correctly read due to modification or obliteration of medical records; (2) Examination reports are obliterated or damaged, making it difficult for the large language model to recognize them; (3) Patients with severe mental disorders (e.g., depression, mania, epileptic seizures, schizophrenia, etc.); (4) Severe lack of clinical information. 2. Exclusion criteria for the prospective study: (1) Patients with severe mental disorders (e.g., depression, mania, epileptic seizures, schizophrenia, etc.); (2) Patients deemed by the investigator as unable to cooperate in completing the trial; (3) Information cannot be correctly read due to patient accent or poor recording quality; (4) Examination reports are obliterated or damaged, making it difficult for the large language model to recognize them.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Percentage score for each case's diagnostic and treatment task (range: 0–100 points);

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Physician subjective satisfaction score with system use (range: 0–100 points);85% accuracy on the epilepsy medical record generation task;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactLin Yichong

Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University

linyc_1@163.com+86 10 83198815

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 17, 2026