Skip to content

Conventional Sleeve versus Stapler Circumcision for Multiple Penile Condyloma Acuminatum: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Conventional Sleeve versus Stapler Circumcision for Multiple Penile Condyloma Acuminatum: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2600118766
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2026-02-10
Start date
2026-02-13
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-02-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Penile Condylomata Acuminata

Interventions

Conventional sleeve circumcision group:None
Stapler circumcision group:None

Sponsors

Hangzhou Third People's Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Male

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age 18–55 years; 2. Clinically diagnosed multiple penile condyloma acuminata (lesions =5, involving the inner foreskin or frenulum); 3. Undergoing circumcision combined with simultaneous lesion ablation (electrocautery or laser).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Individuals with immunodeficiency or those undergoing immunosuppressive therapy; 2. Patients with diabetes; 3. Suspected or confirmed penile malignancy; 4. History of circumcision; 5. Severe phimosis (opening < 20 mm) or excessively short frenulum, making stapler operation unsuitable.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Postoperative pain score;Operative time;Intraoperative blood loss;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Incidence of postoperative edema;Incidence of postoperative infection;Patient satisfaction score;Recurrence rate of condylomata acuminata ;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactZhou Peng

Hangzhou Third People's Hospital

13616555138@139.COM+86 571 8782 7269

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026