FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of the efficacy of AUSS conventional approach and Corner approach in treating lumbar disc herniation

Comparison of the efficacy of AUSS conventional approach and Corner approach in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2600116830
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2026-01-15
Start date
2026-01-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lumbar disc herniation

Interventions

conventional AUSS approach:None
AUSS Corner approach:None

Sponsors

Yunnan Northeast Central Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 70 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Aged 18 to 70 years old; 2.American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II; 3.Patients scheduled for AUSS surgery; 4.Patients with a body mass index (BMI) between 18 and 30 kg/m2; 5.Patients who agree to participate in this study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patients with difficult airway or upper respiratory tract infection; 2.Patients with contraindications to neuroelectrophysiological monitoring; 3.Patients with extremely unstable electrophysiological signals due to non-patient factors such as machine interference.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Intraoperative neuroelectrophysiological monitoring data;Preoperative and postoperative VAS scores;Preoperative and postoperative ODI scores;—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactFang Shaoran

Yunnan Northeast Central Hospital

925109872@qq.com+86 150 1225 8548

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026