Skip to content

Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Electrolysis and Microneedling in Removing Unwanted Eyebrows

Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Electrolysis and Microneedling in Removing Unwanted Eyebrows

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2500115776
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2025-12-31
Start date
2026-01-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Poor aesthetic outcomes of eyebrows after hair transplantation

Interventions

Electrolysis method group:Use the GX-? type multifunctional electrosurgical device to remove the patients aesthetically undesirable eyebrows
Microneedle method group:A follicular harvesting pen with a 0.8 mm outer diameter is used to remove the patients aesthetically undesirable eyebrows

Sponsors

Southern Medical University Southern Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 40 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Those aged 18-40 who are not satisfied with the appearance and need to remove hair transplantation after surgery; 2. The patient's liver and kidney function were normal, and the blood routine and coagulation level were normal before surgery.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with a smoking history within the past 6 months; 2. Patients with diabetes or hyperglycemia (fasting blood glucose >7.0 mmol/L) that affect wound healing; 3. Patients with abnormal blood glucose levels; 4. Patients with abnormal cardiac and pulmonary function; 5. Infection foci in the operative area or adjacent to the operative area; 6. Scar tissue constitution (defined as a history of scar VSS score >=3 points, or persistent scar hypertrophy for >=6 months); 7. Patients with a history of neuropathic pain; 8. The patient took immunosuppressants, cytostatics, anticoagulant hormones, and antibiotics preoperatively; 9. Psychiatric patients.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Follicle regeneration rate at three months post-operation;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Wound healing status;Satisfaction Score;Rate of follicle removal and operation time;Follicle transverse rate;Postoperative complication incidence rate;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactYong Miao

Southern Medical University Southern Hospital

18688845651@163.com+86 20 6164 1868

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026