Skip to content

Clinical Efficacy Comparison of Unilateral Percutaneous Vertebral Body Implant Placement and Unilateral Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Single-Center, Prospective, Non-Randomized Controlled Study

Clinical Efficacy Comparison of Unilateral Percutaneous Vertebral Body Implant Placement and Unilateral Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Single-Center, Prospective, Non-Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2500114974
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2025-12-19
Start date
2025-01-13
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures

Interventions

Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Group:Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures
Percutaneous Vertebral Body Implant Group:Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures

Sponsors

Beijing Friendship Hospital ,Capital Medical University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
60 Years to 100 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age over 60 years; 2. Acute single-level (T10–L5) osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (MRI shows low signal on T1-weighted images and high signal on T2-weighted and STIR sequences); 3. Loss of anterior or middle vertebral height by more than one-third; 4. Complete preoperative and postoperative clinical data available; 5. Patient is able to provide informed consent voluntarily and is willing to complete follow-up.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Multisegmental osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures; 2.Evidence of bone tumors or other bone metabolic disorders; 3.CT scan indicating incomplete or fractured posterior vertebral wall; 4.Contraindications for surgery, such as bleeding/clotting disorders or severe organ dysfunction; 5.Patients requiring prolonged bed rest; 6.Lack of informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Vertebral compression rate (anterior vertebral height / posterior vertebral height × 100%);VAS Low Back Pain Score;ODI Score;Cobb angle;Wedge angle;Vertebral kyphosis angle;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Surgery time;Radiation dose;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactFei Qi

Beijing Friendship Hospital ,Capital Medical University

spinefei@126.com+86 10 63138353

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026