Skip to content

The Effects of Motor Imagery-Based Hand Exoskeleton Systems on Upper Limb Function Recovery in Post-Stroke Patients: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

The Effects of Motor Imagery-Based Hand Exoskeleton Systems on Upper Limb Function Recovery in Post-Stroke Patients: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2500114717
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2025-12-17
Start date
2025-12-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Interventions

True Feedback Group:Equipment and Mode: A non-invasive BCI + hand exoskeleton system (AiHand Expanse-BCI-L1) is used. The exoskeleton is driven by real-time decoding of motor imagery (MI), forming a c
each session is approximately 20 minutes, including 7 minutes of modeling + 13 minutes of training. Modeling Phase: Patients are guided to perform MI with both the affected and healthy hands accordin
patients seated, wearing EEG caps and exoskeletons of the affected hand
a resting EEG for approximately 1 minute before training as a baseline. Parallel Routine Rehabilitation: Both groups received routine rehabilitation including guideline-recommended exercise therapy,
Sham Feedback Group:Equipment and setting consistent: Similar to the true feedback group, a non-invasive BCI + hand exoskeleton system (AiHand Expanse-BCI-L1) was used in a quiet training room. Partic

Sponsors

First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Subjects were diagnosed 1 to 6 months after their first ischemic stroke; 2. Subjects experienced their first radiographically confirmed unilateral ischemic stroke within the past 30–180 days; 3. Subjects passed the BCI blind screening; 4. Active wrist extension >10°, thumb adduction/abduction >10°, and extension of at least two other fingers >10°; 5. Fugl-Meyer Assessment - Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) score of 54 or lower (out of 66), with stable upper limb function to avoid the upper limit effect; 6. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score <=3; 7. Subjects aged 18–80 years; 8. Informed consent was obtained from the subject or their family.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Primary intracerebral hematoma, subarachnoid hemorrhage, or ischemic stroke affecting both hemispheres or both brainstem regions. 2. Use of medications that may interfere with EEG during the study period, including but not limited to diphenhydramine, methylphenidate, caffeine, chlorpromazine, amitriptyline, and dextromethorphan. 3. Other coexisting neuromuscular diseases affecting upper limb motor function. 4. Other neurological disorders affecting the participant's ability to participate in the study. 5. Moderate to severe cognitive impairment, defined as a Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) score <18/30. 6. Uncontrolled depression or other neuropsychiatric disorders that were previously treated with medication before or after the stroke. 7. Uncontrolled hypertension, defined as SBP =185 mmHg or DBP =110 mmHg. 8. Any... MRI/EEG risk factors, including but not limited to: electrically, magnetically, or mechanically activated metallic or non-metallic implants, including pacemakers or intracranial vascular clips; non-fixated metallic parts of the body, including previous metal injuries to the eyes; pregnancy; history of epilepsy or post-stroke seizures; scalp lesions at the intended electrode placement site, or bone defects or hemicraniectomy; 9. Receiving botulinum toxin injections in the affected upper limb within the past 3 months; 10. Participating in another stroke recovery study concurrently; 11. Participants are expected to be unable to adhere to study procedures and follow-up; 12. Life expectancy of less than 6 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Upper Limb Motor Function Measured by the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE);

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Hand Muscle Strength;Active Range of Motion (ROM) of the Hand and Wrist;Stroke Impact Scale (SIS);EEG-Based Neural Activity Patterns;TMS-Induced Motor Evoked Potentials;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactFanfu Fang

First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University

fangfanfu@126.com+86 158 0071 9913

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026