FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of Laparoscopic Micro-incision Cystic-Duct CBDE and Laparoscopic Micro-incision Cystic-Duct CBDE with Self-detaching Biliary Stent in Patients with Gallstones Combined with Common Bile Duct Stones: A Retrospective Study

Comparison of Laparoscopic Micro-incision Cystic-Duct CBDE and Laparoscopic Micro-incision Cystic-Duct CBDE with Self-detaching Biliary Stent in Patients with Gallstones Combined with Common Bile Duct Stones: A Retrospective Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2500114352
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2025-12-10
Start date
2025-12-12
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-12-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Biliary calculus

Interventions

laparoscopic micro-incision cystic-duct common bile duct exploration (LMC-CBDE) plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC):N
laparoscopic micro-incision cystic-duct CBDE with self-detaching biliary stent (LMC-CBDE+S) plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC):N

Sponsors

People's Hospital of Pudong New Area, Shanghai
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients diagnosed with gallstones and exhibiting symptoms or laboratory abnormalities consistent with choledocholithiasis. CBD stones diagnosed via magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography (MRCP) or CT, recurrent episodes of biliary colic and cholangitis, a history of obstructive jaundice, and a history of biliary pancreatitis; 2. ASA 1-4; 3. Age between 18 and 80 years old.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Acute cholangitis, hepatolithiasis, Mirizzi syndrome diagnosed by MRCP, suspected bile duct or gallbladder cancer, negative bile duct explorations since spontaneous passage of small bile duct stones is very common; 2. Pregnancy or Cirrhosis Child Pugh C; 3. Stenosis or deformity of the common bile duct; 4. Individuals with intrahepatic bile duct stones; 5. Blood coagulation function disabled; 6. Individuals with mental disorders or serious organ dysfunction; 7. The diameter of the common bile duct is less than 6mm; 8. Patients with insufficient clinical data.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Diameter of common bile duct;Diameter of gallbladder duct ;Maximum diameter of stone;Number of stones;ASA score ;Mean operative time;Mean blood loss;Hospital stay ;Hospital stay ;Time to resume work (d) ;Total cost (RMB) ;Preoperative Biochemistry findings;—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Age;Gender;BMI ;Comorbidity;Preoperative abdominal surgery ;VAS (1–10) pain score 8 h after surgery;Nasogastric tube removed;Urethral catheters?removed;Oral liquid diet?; Total inflow ;Drain tube removed (d) ;—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactWang yunfeng

People's Hospital of Pudong New Area, Shanghai

Wangyunfeng197911@163.com+86 158 2123 9153

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026