FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of clinical effects of two blunt dissection sheathing methods in PICC catheterization: a single-center, single-blind randomized study controlled experiment

Comparison of clinical effects of two blunt dissection sheathing methods in PICC catheterization: a single-center, single-blind randomized study controlled experiment

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2500113045
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2025-11-24
Start date
2025-11-24
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-12-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

PICC catheterized patients

Interventions

experimental group:one-step sheath delivery method
control group:two-step sheath delivery method

Sponsors

Shanghai General Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 66 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients undergoing Power PICC SOLO catheter placement using the modified Seldinger technique under ultrasound guidance; 2. Age >= 18 years; 3. Verbal communication ability is normal; 4. The local skin at the puncture site is intact with no scarring; 5. Willing to participate in this study and sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Unconsciousness, irritability, and inability to cooperate; 2. Have contraindications for PICC catheterization.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Intraoperative sheathing bleeding volume;—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Incidence of subcutaneous congestion after 3 days of surgery;One-time sheath delivery success rate;Amount of bleeding 24 hours after surgery;—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactXu Dongting

Shanghai General Hospital

335843389@qq.com+86 21 6324 0090

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026