FindTrial
Sign In

Effectiveness and Safety of Flow Diverter versus Conventional Stent-Assisted Coiling in the Treatment of Intracranial Posterior Circulation Aneurysms: A retrospective cohort study

Effectiveness and Safety of Flow Diverter versus Conventional Stent-Assisted Coiling in the Treatment of Intracranial Posterior Circulation Aneurysms: A retrospective cohort study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2500110885
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2025-10-22
Start date
2025-10-22
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intracranial posterior circulation aneurysm

Interventions

Flow Diverter Group:None
Conventional Stent-Assisted Coiling Group:None

Sponsors

The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age > 18 years; 2. Diagnosed with IPCA by digital subtraction angiography (DSA).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Combined with acute cerebral infarction (onset <2 weeks), cerebrovascular malformations, and other severe cerebrovascular diseases; 2. Severe allergy to contrast agents; 3. Severe heart failure; 4. Pregnant or breastfeeding women; 5. Extracranial aneurysms; 6. History of surgery within the past 6 months; 7. Missing imaging data.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
24-Month Postprocedural Complete Aneurysm Occlusion Rate;24-Month Postprocedural Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score;—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
24-month postprocedural incidence of in-stent stenosis;Adherence rate to dual antiplatelet therapy;—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactHui Wang

The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University

wangh22@mail.sysu.edu.cn+86 137 6332 2020

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026