Skip to content

A Single-Center, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effectiveness of EUS-Guided Dual-Directional and Single-Directional Biliary Drainage in Patients with Unresectable Malignant Biliary Obstruction

A Single-Center, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effectiveness of EUS-Guided Dual-Directional and Single-Directional Biliary Drainage in Patients with Unresectable Malignant Biliary Obstruction

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2500110833
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2025-10-21
Start date
2025-10-29
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Unresectable Malignant Biliary Obstruction

Interventions

EUS-SBD group:EUS-guided single-point puncture of the intrahepatic bile duct or common bile duct through the stomach or duodenum, followed by guidewire placement and insertion of a double-pigtail plas
EUS-DBD group:EUS-guided puncture of the intrahepatic bile duct or common bile duct through the stomach or duodenum, with guidewire selective cannulation to the duodenal papilla or biliary-enteric ana

Sponsors

Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age >= 18 years and provision of signed informed consent; 2. Radiologically confirmed malignant biliary obstruction with concomitant upstream biliary duct dilation; 3. Indication for biliary drainage with either contraindication for ERCP (including patients with surgically altered anatomy) or prior failed ERCP biliary drainage. Failed ERCP is defined as the inability to successfully cannulate the common bile duct by an experienced senior endoscopist (performing >100 ERCPs annually, with a lifetime case volume >500); 4. Life expectancy greater than 3 months; 5. Elevated serum total bilirubin, with a direct bilirubin fraction accounting for >= 60% of the total bilirubin; 6. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification of I to III.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Multifocal liver metastases involving >30% of the hepatic parenchyma; 2. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma classified as Bismuth-Corlette type III or IV; 3. Life expectancy of less than 3 months; 4. Uncorrectable coagulation disorders; 5. Cardiac, pulmonary, or hepatic failure; 6. Pregnancy or lactation; 7. Unwillingness or inability to provide written informed consent; 8. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification of IV or V.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Reintervention rate for stent dysfunction;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Technical success rate;Clinical success rate;Postoperative length of hospital stay;Intervention-free survival;Survival;Quality of life;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactShen Shanshan

Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University

shenss@nju.edu.cn+86 135 8404 9527

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026