Skip to content

Comparison of Oliceridine versus Sufentanil on Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion Conditions during Anesthesia Induction: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of Oliceridine versus Sufentanil on Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion Conditions during Anesthesia Induction: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2500110593
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2025-10-16
Start date
2025-10-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None

Interventions

Oliceridine group:During induction of anesthesia, Oliceridine 0.06 mg/kg is administered intravenously.
Sufentanil group:During induction of anesthesia, Sufentanil 0.03 ug/kg is administered intravenously.

Sponsors

The Navy Specialized Medical Center of the People's Liberation Army of China
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 75 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age 18–75 years, regardless of gender. 2. Body mass index (BMI) between 18.0–32 kg/m^2, with physical characteristics suitable for laryngeal mask airway management. 3. ASA physical status classification I–III, with ASA III patients deemed to have acceptable anesthetic risk after preoperative assessment. 4. Scheduled to undergo short-duration natural orifice transluminal urological surgery under general anesthesia without skin incision. 5. Written informed consent obtained from the participant or their legally authorized representative, with voluntary enrollment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Known allergy or history of severe adverse reactions to the study medications (oliceridine, cypofol, sufentanil). 2. Predicted difficult laryngeal mask airway insertion, such as severe limited mouth opening, restricted neck mobility, or Mallampati class IV. 3. Significant cardiopulmonary dysfunction (e.g., acute myocardial infarction, decompensated heart failure, or severe COPD) that may compromise airway safety during device placement. 4. Pregnant or lactating women. 5. Chronic opioid use (>7 days) preoperatively that may alter analgesic drug sensitivity. 6. Neurological disorders or impaired consciousness affecting accuracy of EEG monitoring. 7. Other clinically significant conditions deemed unsuitable for participation by the investigator.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion Conditions Score;Spontaneous Breathing Recovery Time;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Total Anesthetic Dose;the trend of CSI;Hemodynamic Parameters;Emergence Adverse Events;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactMeimei Zhu

The Navy Specialized Medical Center of the People's Liberation Army of China

zmm363636@163.com+86 183 1532 5310

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026