Skip to content

Comparison of Clinical Efficacy Between CGF Pulp Regeneration and Blood Clot Pulp Regeneration in the Treatment of Adult Irreversible Pulpitis and Apical Periodontitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of Clinical Efficacy Between CGF Pulp Regeneration and Blood Clot Pulp Regeneration in the Treatment of Adult Irreversible Pulpitis and Apical Periodontitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2500110031
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2025-09-29
Start date
2025-10-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Irreversible pulpitis and apical periodontitis

Interventions

Experimental Group:Underwent pulp regeneration therapy using concentrated growth factor (CGF)
Control Group:Underwent pulp regeneration therapy using blood clot

Sponsors

Air Force Medical Center
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
9 Years to 45 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. According to the latest national teaching materials for colleges and universities, "Cariology and Endodontics, Fifth Edition", edited by Zhou Xuedong, People's Medical Publishing House, 2020 "and" the Guideline of root canal Treatment Technique "published in Chinese Journal of Stomatology by Society of Cariology and Endodontics, Chinese Stomatological Association in 2014, the inclusion criteria were set as the age of 9-45 years old. 2. Diagnosis of irreversible pulpitis or pulp necrosis or periapical periodontitis; 3. The X-ray films showed that there was no filling material in the root canal, the apical foramen was developed and closed, the periapical space was normal, the periapical membrane cavity was widened, or the apical low density shadow (the shadow diameter was less than 5mm). 4. Patients agreed to participate in the trial and provided written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Severe systemic diseases or pregnant women; 2. Cracked tooth, crown fracture or root fracture; 3. Internal or external root resorption; 4. The presence of opposing teeth; 5. No adjacent teeth contact; 6. Root canal curvature greater than 45 degrees; 6. Chronic periodontal disease, periodontal purulent discharge, abnormal root loosening; 7. The root canal cannot be effectively dredged to the root tip; 8. Presence of root canal perforation or separation of root canal instruments; 9. The large area defect of the affected tooth could not be repaired in the later period. 10. Severe calcification or atresia of the root canal.

Design outcomes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Pain index 1 week after surgery;Electric Pulp Test (EPT);Degree of vascular ingrowth in the root canal;

Primary

MeasureTime frame
One year success rate after surgery;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactHe Wenxi

Department of Stomatology, Air Force Medical Center

hewenxi@fmmu.edu.cn+86 159 9174 3898

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026