Skip to content

Comparison of Ciprofol, Remimazolam, and Propofol on Arrhythmia Inducibility in Pediatric Supraventricular Tachycardia: A Retrospective Study

Clinical analysis of different intravenous anesthetics used for radiofrequency ablation of supraventricular tachycardia in children

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2500109472
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2025-09-18
Start date
2025-09-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-09-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

supraventricular tachycardia

Interventions

Sponsors

Women's and Children's Hospital affiliated to Qingdao University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status ? - ?; no prior history of radiofrequency ablation; supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) was diagnosed based on clinical manifestations and surface electrocardiogram (ECG) during tachycardia, and the patient required RFCA treatment due to recurrent tachycardia; anti - arrhythmic drugs were discontinued for at least 5 half - lives; total intravenous anesthesia was administered via tracheal intubation; and the same intravenous general anesthetic agent was used for both the induction and maintenance of anesthesia.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The exclusion criterion was patients with incomplete perioperative clinical data.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
arrhythmia inducibility;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
ablation success;BIS;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactRen Yueyi

Qingdao Women and Children's Hospital

xxgmz1173@126.com+86 185 0532 1173

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026