Skip to content

A study on the effects of different ankle joint protection methods on the athletic ability and adaptability of tennis players

A study on the effects of different ankle joint protection methods on the athletic ability and adaptability of tennis players

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2500107099
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2025-08-04
Start date
2024-12-02
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic ankle instability

Interventions

Brace Group:Three tennis specific training sessions per week require participants in the protective gear group to wear the professional ankle guards provided in this study on both ankle joints for a t
Taping Group:The subjects in the binding group underwent ankle locking basket binding on both ankle joints for a total of 6 weeks. The intervention group only intervenes in weekly tennis specialized c
2. Anchor point (white sticker)
3. Horseshoe stirrup (white sticker)
4. Lock heel (white sticker)
5. The character "8" (heavy bullet)
6. Secure anchor point and cover (lightly bounce), as shown in Figure 2. Due to the direct relationship between the effectiveness of the binding restriction and the technical level of the operators, a
Control Group:During the specialized training course for the experimental subjects, no ankle joint protection measures were taken.

Sponsors

Beijing Sport University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Athletic Level: National Level 2 or above tennis player (certification required) 2. Health Status: - No history of ankle injury for >=6 months (confirmed by clinical palpation and ultrasound); - No history of lower limb surgery; - CAIT (Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool) score >=28 (excluding functional instability); 3. Training Consistency: >=15 hours of specialized training per week for over 1 year; 4. Compliance: Signed informed consent form, committed to completing 6-week intervention.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Acute injuries: Ankle sprains, fractures, or ligament tears within the past three months; 2. Chronic conditions: Inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and gout; neurological disorders (e.g., post-stroke sequelae); 3. Skin contraindications: Allergy to taping adhesive or presence of skin lesions; 4. Intervention conflicts: Use of taping or bracing for training within the past month.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Agility test;Vertical jump height test;Speed test;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Ball stability test;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactYue Li

Beijing Sport University

tjtliyue@buu.edu.cn+86 188 1064 8285

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026