Skip to content

Comparing efficiency and safety between heads-up 3D digital and conventional microscopes in ICL surgery

Comparing efficiency and safety between heads-up 3D digital and conventional microscopes in ICL surgery

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2500106934
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2025-07-31
Start date
2025-08-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Refractive error

Interventions

Experimental group:Using 3D system conducting ICL surgery
Control group:Using traditional system conducting ICL surgery

Sponsors

Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. The patient is older than 18 years old; 2. First ICL surgery in one or both eyes; 3. Refractive instability (annual change =0.8;

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patients with other systemic diseases or eye diseases, history of eye surgery, history of eye trauma, and inability to give informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Efficiency(UDVA/BCVA);Subjective comfort of the surgeon;Frequency and type of complications (including during and after surgery);Subjective visual quality and dry eye symptoms after the subject's surgery;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Duration of the main step (from the time the surgical incision is made to the completion of the lens implantation);

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactShaozhen Zhao

Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital

zhaosz1997@sina.com+86 22 8642 8818

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026