Skip to content

Clinical Efficacy of Different Intervertebral Space Localization Techniques in Intrathecal Anesthesia for Joint Replacement Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Clinical Efficacy of Different Intervertebral Space Localization Techniques in Intrathecal Anesthesia for Joint Replacement Patients

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2500106085
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2025-07-17
Start date
2025-07-18
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

knee/hip arthroplasty

Interventions

Preoperative Ultrasound Localization Group: During preoperative ultrasound-guided puncture, the operator used ultrasound to estimate the puncture point and the distance from the skin to the epidural s
Flexion Lateral Decubitus Radiography Group:Before puncture, flexion lateral decubitus lumbar X-ray plain films were taken to select the target intervertebral space, estimate the needle insertion angl
Surface Anatomical Landmark Group:The needle insertion point was estimated by palpating anatomical landmarks.

Sponsors

China Beijing Peking University Third Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
50 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients with knee or hip joint 2. 50 years old< = age< = 80 years 3. The anesthesia method is neuraxial anesthesia 4. American Society of Anesthesiologists Grading I~I I I

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Refusal to sign informed consent 2. Patients who are unable to cooperate with neuraxial anesthesia, such as suffering from cognitive impairment and mental illness; 3. Contraindications to neuraxial anesthesia (such as patients with severe heart, liver, kidney and other important organ dysfunction; History of anesthetic allergy; local infection at the puncture site, etc.; ) 4. History of previous lumbar spine surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Success rate of first attempt in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia puncture ;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Puncture conditions: Selection of puncture intervertebral space, total number of puncture attempts; whether the space was changed, puncture pathway, number of puncture points ,Incidence of difficult neuraxial puncture, Depth of epidural needle insertion;Puncture time: Time to successful epidural puncture; total puncture time ; Occurrence of puncture-related complications;Patient satisfaction evaluation ;Operator confidence score;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactQiong Lan

China Beijing Peking University Third Hospital

13810146245@163.com+86 138 1014 6245

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026