Skip to content

A Prospective Clinical Study Comparing the Diagnostic Capabilities of Wet Aspiration Technique and Standard Negative Pressure Technique in EUS-FNB for Mediastinal and Abdominal Lymph Nodes

A Prospective Clinical Study Comparing the Diagnostic Capabilities of Wet Aspiration Technique and Standard Negative Pressure Technique in EUS-FNB for Mediastinal and Abdominal Lymph Nodes

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2500105834
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2025-07-11
Start date
2025-01-16
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-07-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lymphadenopathy

Interventions

Gold Standard:Pathological diagnosis
Index test:Standard negative pressure technique and wet aspiration technique

Sponsors

Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Signed dated informed consent; 2. Promise to abide by the research procedures and cooperate with the implementation of the whole process of research; 3. Subjects are over 18 years old, and gender is not limited; 4. Imaging examination (B-ultrasound, CT or MRI) to diagnose or suspect lymph node lesions; 5. The lesion is larger than 1cm.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Unable or refusing to sign informed consent 2. Anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy cannot be suspended; 3. Be pregnant or lactating; 4. Presence of coagulation disorders (PLT 1.5); 5. Have a history of mental illness; 6. Have other medical conditions that are not suitable for FNB puncture.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Tissue sample size from each puncture obtained by wet aspiration technique;Cell sample size from each puncture obtained by wet aspiration technique;Tissue sample characteristics from each puncture obtained by wet aspiration technique;Cell sample characteristics from each puncture obtained by wet aspiration technique;Wet aspiration technique pathological results;Tissue sample size from each puncture obtained by standard negative pressure technique;Cell sample size from each puncture obtained by standard negative pressure technique;Tissue sample characteristics from each puncture obtained by standard negative pressure technique;Cell sample characteristics from each puncture obtained by standard negative pressure technique;Standard negative pressure technique pathological results;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Wet aspiration technique sample adequacy scoring;Wet aspiration technique smear blood contamination scoring;Wet aspiration technique cell density scoring;Wet aspiration technique pathological diagnosis scoring;Standard negative pressure technique sample adequacy scoring;Standard negative pressure technique smear blood contamination scoring;Standard negative pressure technique cell density scoring;Standard negative pressure technique pathological diagnosis scoring;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactFei Liu

Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University

948923510@qq.com+86 132 0519 3467

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026