Skip to content

Comparison of the safety and short-term clinical efficacy of biologic flap technique and double flap technique for esophagogastric anastomosis after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study

Comparison of the safety and short-term clinical efficacy of biologic flap technique and double flap technique for esophagogastric anastomosis after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2500105118
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2025-06-30
Start date
2025-06-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-07-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastric cancer

Interventions

Biologic flap group (Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy + biologic flap technique):None
Double flap technique (Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy +double flap technique):None

Sponsors

The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Clinical stage I upper gastric cancer; 2) Complete clinical pathological data; 3) No neoadjuvant therapy before surgery; 4) Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy; 5) R0 resection.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) The esophagogastric anastomosis did not use biologic flap technique or double muscle flap technique; 2) Primary tumors in two or more locations; 3) Follow-up time was less than 6 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The incidence of postoperative complications;The quality of life at 12 months after surgery;The incidence of reflux esophagitis at 12 months after surgery;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Operation time;Postoperative nutritional status;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactLin Fan

The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University

linnet@xjtufh.edu.cn+86 29 8532 3215

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026