Skip to content

Clinical Validation of the Personalized Optimal Positioning Model for the Acetabular Cup during Hip Arthroplasty

Clinical Validation of the Personalized Optimal Positioning Model for the Acetabular Cup during Hip Arthroplasty

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2500104688
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2025-06-20
Start date
2025-03-03
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hip joint disease

Interventions

Control group:The control group placed the cup according to the "Lewinnek safety zone" and "Combined anteversion angle".
Experimental group:The study group placed the cup according to the "optimal cup placement angle" and "SH9H conical safety zone".

Sponsors

The Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients over 18 years old who undergo unilateral primary total hip replacement surgery due to hip osteoarthritis, femoral head necrosis, congenital hip dysplasia, femoral neck fracture, etc. (including patients who have undergone contralateral hip replacement); 2. The subjects fully understand the benefits and risks of this trial, are willing to participate in completing the relevant content of the trial, and sign an informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients undergoing THA surgery through non posterior lateral approach; 2. The medical history clearly indicates the presence of important soft tissue injuries around the joints, such as the gluteus medius and sciatic nerve; 3. Accidentally damaging important soft tissues around the joint during surgery (such as the gluteus medius, sciatic nerve, etc.); 4. Postoperative CT shows that the anteversion angle of the femoral prosthesis differs by more than 5 ° from the preoperative predicted anteversion angle; 5. Postoperative CT showed that the anteversion angle or abduction angle of the research group's cup was outside the "SH9H" safety zone, while the anteversion angle or abduction angle of the control group's cup was outside the "Lewinnek safety zone" and "combined anteversion angle" safety zones; 6. Patients who develop infections during postoperative follow-up; 7. Patients who experience dislocation due to major violence such as car accidents or falls from heights after surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Dislocation rate;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Hip joint function score;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactHuiwu Li

The Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

huiwu1223@163.com+86 180 1979 0587

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026