FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of Efficacy Between Endoscopy and Vacuum-Assisted Excision in the Surgical Treatment of Gynecomastia

Comparison of Efficacy Between Endoscopy and Vacuum-Assisted Excision in the Surgical Treatment of Gynecomastia

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2500104381
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2025-06-16
Start date
2025-07-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gynecomastia

Interventions

Minimally invasive surgery group/laparoscopic surgery group:None

Sponsors

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Male
Age
12 Years to 48 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Have a strong desire for surgery and AWBU grade 1-2; 2. Be between the ages of 12 and 48; 3. Radiographically and clinically diagnosed with gynecomastia; 4. Voluntarily participate in the study and provide written informed consent; 5. Physical condition can tolerate surgical treatment under general anesthesia or local anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. AWBU Level 3; 2. Male breast cancer; 3. Patients who were lost to follow-up during the follow-up period; 4. Suffering from endocrine-related diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Automated whole breast ultrasound;—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Postoperative scar size;Healing time;Length of patient stay;Postoperative satisfaction;Postoperative pain and complications;—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactChen Xi

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University

13804517666@163.com+86 138 0451 7666

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026