Skip to content

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib vs. Tocilizumab in Methotrexate-Inadequate Responders with Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib vs. Tocilizumab in Methotrexate-Inadequate Responders with Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2500104153
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2025-06-11
Start date
2025-07-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-06-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid arthritis

Interventions

Group A (UPA+MTX):None
Group B (TCZ+MTX):None

Sponsors

The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 75 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1 Meet the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for RA, 2 Age >=18 years, 3 Moderate to severe active RA defined as DAS28 score >3.2, 4 Inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX) after >=3 months of treatment, 5 Complete clinical case data available, 6 Patients voluntarily signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1 Current active tuberculosis or hepatitis infection, severe infections, or malignancy, 2 Other autoimmune diseases (excluding those secondary to RA), 3 New thromboembolic events within the past three months or with multiple organ dysfunction, 4 Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
ACR20;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
ACR50;ACR70;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactZhang Yan

The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University

zhangy1971@163.com+86 177 0987 3636

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026