FindTrial
Sign In

Comparing the therapeutic effects of integrated emergency treatment versus conventional treatment strategies on patients with traumatic cervical spine injuries.

Comparing the therapeutic effects of integrated emergency treatment versus conventional treatment strategies on patients with traumatic cervical spine injuries.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2500104012
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2025-06-10
Start date
2025-06-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-06-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical spine injury.

Interventions

Integrated treatment group.:None
Conventional treatment group:None

Sponsors

The First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 100 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.It meets the diagnostic criteria for cervical spine injury. 2.The injury factors were all external factors. 3.Ages 18 years and older.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Pre-hospital death cases; 2.Severe pre-injury neurological deficits (such as muscle weakness due to ischemic stroke, etc.). 3.Pregnant; 4.Patients with a history of cervical spine injury. 5.Individuals with severe mental illness who cannot cooperate. 6.Lack of outcome indicator data.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
ASIA Impairment Scale and its improvement status;—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public Contactxiangqiang

The First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University

xqiang163@163.com+86 138 9617 1157

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026