Skip to content

Digital quantitative analysis of occlusal and interproximal contact variations of implant-supported fixed prostheses: a prospective cohort study

Digital quantitative analysis of occlusal and interproximal contact variations of implant-supported fixed prostheses: a prospective cohort study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2500103425
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2025-05-29
Start date
2025-06-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-06-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Single-tooth edentulism

Interventions

Exposed group:None
Non-exposed group:None

Sponsors

Peking University Hospital of Stomatology
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
20 Years to 70 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. The age of the patients is not less than 20 years old and not more than 70 years old; 2. A single tooth in the posterior and anterior areas without free loss has been restored by implant-supported single crown without clinical symptoms; 3. When the posterior implant-supported single crown was first fitted with the 12µm occlusal foil and 30µm occlusal paper, the 12µm occlusal foil could be extracted without resistance during light bites, and the 30µm occlusal paper could contact the prosthesis during heavy bites. The primary use of anterior implant-supported single crown is based on the median light occlusion, and the forward occlusion should be guided by the natural teeth together. 4. Dental floss passed through the adjacent contact area with appropriate resistance when the implant was initially worn; 5. Presence of stable intercuspal intercuspal interface; 6. The position of the adjacent teeth and the opposite teeth of the implant crown was basically normal and not loose. 7. The follow-up time after implant restoration is not less than 3 months;

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. The adjacent teeth or opposite teeth of implant-supported single crown were implant prostheses; 2. No occlusal contact of the adjacent teeth of the implant crown; 3. Filling cusps exist in the opposite teeth of implant-supported single crown. 4. Uncontrolled periodontitis; 5. Temporomandibular joint disease; 6. If an adjustment was made to change the local occlusion distribution or the adjacent contact after tooth wearing, such as crown restoration or occlusal surface filling to change the occlusal force distribution, or proximal resin filling to change the adjacent contact, the adjustment time was set as the end point of follow-up.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Occlusal clearance;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Occlusal contact area;Implant Fracture:;Prosthetic Complications;Occlusal clearance value (silicone registration method);Articulating Paper Evaluation Method (Intraoral Clinical Photographic );T-Scan III Occlusal Analysis System Evaluation;Adjacent Tooth Displacement (Intraoral Scanning Method);Floss Test for Interproximal Contacts;Peri-implantitis;Implant Survival;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactDing Qian

Peking University Hospital of Stomatology

dingqian.623@163.com+86 15120033697

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026