Skip to content

Aesthetic effect of immediate implant in aesthetic area and clinical effect of soft and hard tissue intervention

Aesthetic effect of immediate implant in aesthetic area and clinical effect of soft and hard tissue intervention

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2500102938
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2025-05-21
Start date
2023-02-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-05-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dentition defect

Interventions

Experimental group:Root canal guided immediate implantation technique
Control group:Free Hand Immediate Planting Technology

Sponsors

Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-Sen University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: In the study on the intervention factors of flapless technique, the inclusion criteria are: (1) Patients with single tooth loss in the maxillary aesthetic school district received immediate implantation and immediate restoration, and were followed up clinically for at least 1 year after the final restoration was completed; (2) During the preparation process of the implantation site, standard immediate implantation surgery procedures were accepted, and lip side non flap technique intervention was performed at the same time; (3) No history of heavy smoking (>10 cigarettes/day); (4) Neat arrangement of teeth, normal bite relationship, no night grinding or clenching of teeth; (5) No acute inflammation in the surgical area; (5) Reasons for missing teeth include traumatic crown fracture, root fracture, dental caries, and failure of root canal treatment that cannot be preserved; (6) Adjacent teeth have not undergone restorative treatment, and there are no serious dental or periodontal diseases; (7) The bone mass in the dental implant area is sufficient, with vertical bone resorption not exceeding 1mm, and the thickness of the labial bone plate is at least 1mm; (8) The ideal three-dimensional position for implant placement; (9) Good initial stability, implantation torque >= 35N · cm, Zimmer company product selected for implantation system; (10) Good oral hygiene and patient compliance; (11) Informed consent form signed before surgery. In the study of intervention factors for root canal guided implantation site preparation technology, the inclusion criteria are: (1) No systemic diseases; (2) No history of heavy smoking (>10 cigarettes/day); (3) Neat arrangement of teeth, normal bite relationship, no night grinding or clenching of teeth; (4) No acute inflammation in the surgical area; (5) Reasons for missing dental crowns include traumatic crown fracture, root fracture, dental caries, and failure of root canal treatment that cannot be preserved; (6) Adjacent teeth have not undergone restorative treatment, and there are no serious dental or periodontal diseases; (7) The bone mass in the dental implant area is sufficient, with vertical bone resorption not exceeding 1mm, and the thickness of the labial bone plate is at least 1mm; (8) Good initial stability, implantation torque >= 35N · cm; (9) Good oral hygiene, good patient compliance, able to follow up on schedule and adhere to postoperative precautions.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: (1) People with systemic diseases (such as uncontrolled diabetes) that can interfere with the normal process of osseointegration; (2) Long term use of Ziti or amino bisphosphonates; (3) Allergens to the materials and drugs used in this experiment; (4) There are acute infections in the surgical area; (5) Heavy smokers (>10 cigarettes/day); (6) Alcoholics or drug addicts; (7) Individuals with severe occlusal dysfunction (such as night grinding and clenching teeth); (8) Patients with partial or severe vertical defects of the labial bone plate at the extraction site; (9) After implantation, there is no good initial stability of the implant, and the implantation torque is less than 35 N.Cm; (10) Individuals with extremely poor oral hygiene conditions; (11) Individuals with mental illnesses who are unable to cooperate.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Three-dimensional site positioning;Labial convexity score;Pink esthetic score;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Esthetic risk assessment;Visual analog scale(patient satisfaction);Marginal bone loss;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactHu Xiaowen

Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-Sen University

robert717@qq.com+86 130 7678 1779

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026