FindTrial
Sign In

Effects of two different treatment methods on wound healing of tongue after lingual mucosal urethroplasty: a clinical comparative study of acellular dermis coverage and direct suture

Effects of two different treatment methods on wound healing of tongue after lingual mucosal urethroplasty: a clinical comparative study of acellular dermis coverage and direct suture

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2500101158
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2025-04-21
Start date
2022-06-23
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urethral stricture

Interventions

Direct suture of tongue mucosa group:NA
Acellular dermis coverage group:NA

Sponsors

Shanghai sixth people's Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Male, aged between 18 and 60 years old. 2. Patients who can complete relevant questionnaires under the guidance of medical staff; 3. Patients with anterior urethral stenosis diagnosed by auxiliary examinations such as urethroscopy, urethral ultrasound, retrograde urethrography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); 4. Patients undergoing lingual mucosal urethroplasty.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: He had a history of tongue mucosa sampling and oral malignancy and was unable to complete follow-up independently.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pain level;—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
numbness;Swelling;Degree of bleeding;—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactQiang Fu

Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital

ljsong@sjtu.edu.cn+86 186 3017 2757

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026