Skip to content

Comparison of the clinical effect of Straumann AS angle screw channel and conventional, Nobel ASC abutment in implant-restoration in the aesthetic area

Comparison of the clinical effect of Straumann AS angle screw channel and conventional, Nobel ASC abutment in implant-restoration in the aesthetic area

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2500096623
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2025-01-27
Start date
2025-01-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dentition defect

Interventions

AS group:Straumann AS Angled Screw Channel Abutment
ASC group:Nobel Procera ASC Angled Screw Channel Abutment
Conventional group:No angle conventional screw channel abutment

Sponsors

Stomatology Hospital, School of Stomatology, Zhejiang University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1: Age >= 18 years at the time of surgery; 2: Single implant restorations in the upper anterior aesthetic region (13-23) greater than one year old; 3: Free of oral mucosal disease and oral infections; 4: One-piece crown restorations using AS/ASC abutments or restorations with conventional abutments; 5: Complete imaging of final restorations prior to wearing the teeth and at a functional load of more than 12 months.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1: Heavy smokers (>10 cigarettes/day); 2: Uncontrolled periodontitis (whole mouth plaque score >20%, whole mouth bleeding score >25%, periodontal pocket depth >5mm); 3: Systemic diseases that can affect implant therapy or patients with associated medications, such as uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, current intake of bisphosphonates (for treatment of malignant tumours), pregnancy or plans for pregnancy, or history of head and neck History of radiotherapy; 4: Poor compliance and inability to co-operate with treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Marginal bone loss;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Biological indicators;Buccal bone thickness resorption;Pink/white aesthetic score (PES/WES);Patient satisfaction;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactWang Yu

Stomatology Hospital, School of Stomatology, Zhejiang University

wangyuzju@zju.edu.cn+86 136 5681 8033

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026