Skip to content

Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Two Different Approaches to Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Two Different Approaches to Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2500096192
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2025-01-20
Start date
2025-01-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal cancer

Interventions

Blank Control Group:Blank C
Group A (Medial Transverse Process ESP Injection Group):Before starting the block, use a convex array probe beginning at the first rib and count downward sequentially to locate and mark the T9 segment
Group B (Between Transverse Process ESP Injection Group):Intervention Group B (Intertransverse Injection Group): Using the same method as Intervention Group A, locate the first rib and then count down

Sponsors

The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: (1) Age between 18 and 80 years (2) ASA classification of 1-3 (3) Patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: (1) Body mass index (BMI) > 30 (2) Allergy to local anesthetics (3) Local infection at the puncture site (4) Presence of peripheral neuropathy (5) Coagulation disorders, defined as prothrombin time or activated partial thromboplastin time exceeding the standard values or an international normalized ratio (INR) outside the normal range (6) History of opioid abuse (7) Inability to communicate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
postoperative 3h Resting NRS Pain Score;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Postoperative resting and dynamic NRS pain scores at 6, 12, 24, and 48h;Intraoperative opioid usage;Postoperative 48-hour PCIA pump usage;Postoperative supplemental analgesic dosage;Sleep quality;Time to first ambulation;ESPB-related complications;Postoperative nausea and vomiting rate;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactHongfei Chen

The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University

chhfei@126.com+86 136 9580 2515

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026