Skip to content

Comparison of implant placement accuracy between dynamic navigation-guided trephine and conventional drilling preparation techniques

Comparison of implant placement accuracy between dynamic navigation-guided trephine and conventional drilling preparation techniques

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2400094380
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2024-12-20
Start date
2025-01-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-01-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dentition defect edentulous

Interventions

Dynamic navigation ring drill group:Circumferential drill preparation technology
Dynamic navigation of traditional drill sets:Traditional drill preparation techniques

Sponsors

Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 70 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age 18 - 70 years; 2. Patients with dental defects requiring implant restoration; 3.There are no soft or hard tissue defects or lesions affecting implant surgery in the region of implant placement; 4.Voluntary participation and signing an informed consent form and agreeing to follow-up visits;

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with a history of maxillofacial radiotherapy, bisphosphonate injection, or denosumab therapy; 2. Have had a heart attack in the past 6 months; 3. Those who are still unable to maintain oral hygiene after oral hygiene guidance and have poor compliance; 4. Patient did not sign informed consent; 5. Poor patient compliance and inability to conduct long-term follow-up;

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Implant placement accuracy;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactYude Ding

Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital

Dingyude65@163.com+86 178 2683 1028

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026