Skip to content

A Comparative Analysis of the Safety and Efficacy of Remote Robot-Assisted Percutaneous Kyphoplasty and Conventional Robot-Assisted Percutaneous Kyphoplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

A Comparative Analysis of the Safety and Efficacy of Remote Robot-Assisted Percutaneous Kyphoplasty and Conventional Robot-Assisted Percutaneous Kyphoplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2400094141
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2024-12-17
Start date
2024-12-25
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-01-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spinal fracture

Interventions

Sponsors

First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
55 Years to 90 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: (1) Age: male >60 years old, female >55 years old; (2) Confirming the diagnosis of osteoporosis;(3) Fresh fractures within two weeks;(4) signing of the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: (1) Multiple fractures (2) Old fractures (3) Severe deformity of the vertebral arch (4) Severe systemic diseases (5) Coagulation disorders (6) Pathological fractures (7) Patients with tuberculosis and tumors

Design outcomes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Bone cement injection volume;Surgery time;Intraoperative blood loss;Postoperative complications occurrence;Preoperative and postoperative pain scoring;

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change in vertebral height;Change in local cobb's angle;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactShen Cailiang

First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University

shencailiang@ahmu.edu.cn+86 139 5516 2616

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026