Skip to content

Effect Evaluation of Ultrasound-Guided Tunnel PICC Catheterization Technique vs. Traditional PICC Catheterization Technique in pediatric patients

Effect Evaluation of Ultrasound-Guided Tunnel PICC Catheterization Technique vs. Traditional PICC Catheterization Technique in pediatric patients

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2400093056
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2024-11-27
Start date
2024-12-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-12-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tumor

Interventions

Intervention group:Tunneled PICC placement
control group:General PICC placement

Sponsors

The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
No minimum to 18 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The patients were ? aged =18 years old; ? children who met the indications for PICC placement; ? patients whose parents were able to communicate with them; ? patients whose parents voluntarily participated in the study and signed the informed consent form, and who were able to cooperate with the clinical follow-up.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: ? Patients with bacteremia and sepsis combined with severe systemic infectious diseases; ? Participants in other studies during the study period.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The success of rate of first puncture;Incidence of catheter prolapse;Incidence of atopic dermatitis;Unplanned extubation rate;Incidence of catheter-related infections;Incidence of catheter-related thrombosis ;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
time of placement;Amount of bleeding during catheterization;

Countries

china

Contacts

Public ContactJuanping zhong

The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University

zhongjp2015@163.com+86 189 1984 5190

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026