Skip to content

An exploratory study on the effect of brain-computer interface training based on motor imagination on upper limb motor function in patients with acute stroke

An exploratory study on the effect of brain-computer interface training based on motor imagination on upper limb motor function in patients with acute stroke

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2400092464
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2024-11-18
Start date
2025-01-03
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Interventions

Experimental Group:Brain-computer Interface training based on motor imagery
Control Group:motor imagery training

Sponsors

Quanzhou First Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. First stroke, including ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, in accordance with the definition of stroke in the Diagnostic Points of Major Cerebrovascular Diseases in China 2019; 2. 48 hours after the vital signs are stable and the course of disease is less than 2 weeks; 3. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) >= 20 points, can understand and execute basic instructions 4.18 years =55 points; 8. Sitting balance >=2 levels; 9. Patients agreed to participate in the study and signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Have severe cognitive impairment and have a simple mental state examination (MMSE) score less than 20 points, hearing impairment, visual impairment, aphasia and other disorders can not cooperate with training; 2. Suffering from muscle, bone and other neurological diseases affecting the motor function of the upper limb, such as limb bone fractures, peripheral neuropathy, muscle injuries, etc.; 3. Have a clear history of other cognitive disorders, such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, etc. 4. The skin of the head electrode pad contact site is damaged or allergic to the electrode; 5. Patients with metal implants, metal pacemakers or skull defects. 6. The patient and his family refused treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Fugl-Meyer Assessment for upper extremity motor function;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Action Research Arm Test;Box and Block Test;grip strength test;Pinch force test;Modified Ashworth scale;Fugl-Meyer Assessment for upper extremity sensory function;Modified Barthel Index;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactLijian Wu

Quanzhou First Hospital

wulijian123@qq.com+86 186 9471 7117

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026