Skip to content

Drug coated balloon versus second-generation drug-eluting stent in the treatment of de novo chronic total occlusion of coronary arteries:a prospective, randomized controlled, multicenter clinical study

Drug coated balloon versus second-generation drug-eluting stent in the treatment of de novo chronic total occlusion of coronary arteries:a prospective, randomized controlled, multicenter clinical study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2400086535
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2024-07-04
Start date
2025-04-02
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-06-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

chronic total occlusion of coronary artery

Interventions

DCB group (Experimental group):CTO lesions were treated only with drug balloon dilation after predilation
DES group(control group):CTO lesions were treated only with DES implantation after predilation

Sponsors

The Affiliated Huaian NO.1 People‘s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. 18 years old <= age <= 80 years old. 2. Patients with coronary heart disease confirmed by coronary angiography or coronary CTA. 3. Clinical indications for CTO revascularization judged by physicians can refer to the following criteria: Prior imaging or CTA indicated that the patient had at least one complete epicardial vessel occlusion combined with at least one ischemic indication: (1) The occluded vessels are located in the near middle part of the anterior descending branch or the near middle part of the right coronary artery, which has a large blood supply range, and the patients still have cardiac seizure after drug treatment; (2) There are signs of severe myocardial ischemia, regardless of whether there is abnormal ventricular wall movement; (3) There were no signs of severe myocardial ischemia, but the exercise stress test indicated that the ischemia range was greater than 10% of the left ventricular weight. 4. The reference diameter of target lesion vessels was 2.25-3.5mm. 5. If there are non-target lesions that require concurrent treatment, non-target lesions should be treated before target lesions and no serious complications after treatment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Clinical exclusion criteria: 1. Diagnosed as acute ST elevation myocardial infarction by the investigators; 2. Severe heart failure (HYHA Grade IV) or left ventricular ejection fraction 30%) (3) Coronary dissection (NHLBI standard Grade C or above) (4) Coronary artery perforation 2. Bifurcation lesions with lateral branches requiring stent implantation; 3. Left main disease; 4. Intrastent restenosis; 5. Graft disease of people underwent CABG.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
in-segment target lesion late lumen lose(LLL);

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
device-oriented composite,DoCE;target lesion restenosis rate(RR);SAQ(Seattle Angina Questionnaire) score-7;Cardiovascular related hospitalization;Technical success;Procedural success;patient-oriented composite,PoCE;in-segment diameter and area stenosis of target lesions;bleeding;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactZhang Xiwen

The Affiliated Huaian NO.1 People‘s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University

zhangxiwen303@163.com+86 187 5230 1110

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026