Skip to content

Implant Accuracy of a Semi-Autonomous Robotic System vs a Dynamic Navigation System - A Clinical Retrospective Study

Implant Accuracy of a Semi-Autonomous Robotic System vs a Dynamic Navigation System - A Clinical Retrospective Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2400085089
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2024-05-30
Start date
2024-06-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-06-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dentition defect

Interventions

Semi-Autonomous Robotic Systems Group:None

Sponsors

Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 70 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Accepting the application of dynamic navigation systems or robot systems for implant restoration of missing teeth, and signing an informed consent form; 2. Good overall health condition; 3. There is sufficient opening and sufficient margin (for fixing the navigation device).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Serious systemic diseases, such as uncontrolled diabetes, serious heart disease and autoimmune diseases; 2. Individuals with severe periodontal disease or other serious oral diseases, or with severe insufficient residual bone mass; 3. Received head and neck radiation therapy within 2 years or currently undergoing head and neck radiation therapy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Implant accuracy;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical factors affecting implant accuracy;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactJianping Chen

Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital

1522643060@qq.com+86 159 0664 4221

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026