FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of the efficacy of intense pulsed light dual-frequency filter (ACNE) and 590nm filter in the treatment of facial acne vulgaris

Comparison of the efficacy of intense pulsed light dual-frequency filter (ACNE) and 590nm filter in the treatment of facial acne vulgaris

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2400081757
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2024-03-11
Start date
2024-03-11
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-03-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Facial acne vulgaris

Interventions

590nm:590nm filter
ACNE:dual-frequency filter (ACNE)

Sponsors

The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
16 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with facial acne vulgaris undergoing intense pulsed light treatment, ages 18 to 60 years, who are taking antibiotics for acne (such as doxycycline or minocycline) were also included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with a history of keloid (scar constitution) and photosensitive disease in the past 6 months, active skin infections, oral retinol therapy, patients who received laser therapy in the previous 3 months, and pregnant and lactating women.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The number of pimples, pustules, and acnes on the face;—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Hayashi score;Sebum production level;Melanin Index (MI);Erythema index (EI);Quality of life score;—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public Contactzhanghuan tian

The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University

516373312@qq.com+86 159 2289 1131

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026