Invasive blood pressure monitoring by ultrasound-guided artery puncture through the distal radial artery approach at the anatomical snuffbox compared with the conventional artery approach

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

ChiCTR

Registry ID

ChiCTR2400081006

Enrollment

Unknown

Registered

2024-02-20

Start date

2023-05-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-02-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Surgery requires arterial puncture and invasive blood pressure monitoring

Interventions

A:Ultrasound-guided puncture through the snuff bottle artery was performed

B:Ultrasound-guided puncture through conventional radial artery was performed

C:Ultrasound-guided puncture through the dorsal artery of the foot was performed

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients enrolled in ASA Grade I to III for elective surgery requiring invasive blood pressure monitoring by arterial puncture

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with severe coagulopathy, poor collateral circulation (positive in Allen's test), and local skin infections.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Puncture success rate;Number of puncture;Puncture time;	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Postoperative compression time;NRS pain score 3 h after surgery;The difference from noninvasive blood pressure on the same side;	—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public Contactzhuweijuan

The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College, Zhejiang, China.

weijuan3516@sina.com+86 137 3696 5200

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026