Skip to content

Comparing the Efficacy of "envelope-type coronally advanced flap" and "tunnel type coronally advanced flap" in the Treatment of Miller Class I and II Gingival Recession:A Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparing the Efficacy of "envelope-type coronally advanced flap" and "tunnel type coronally advanced flap" in the Treatment of Miller Class I and II Gingival Recession:A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2400080898
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2024-02-18
Start date
2024-02-18
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gingival recession

Interventions

envelope-type coronally advanced flap with CTG:The gingival recession area was covered with an envelope-type coronally advanced flap for root coverage.
tunnel type coronally advanced flap with CTG:The gingival recession area was covered by tunnel type coronally advanced flap for root surface coverage.

Sponsors

Hunan Xiangya Stomatological Hospital Central South University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ? Both males and females aged =18 years. ? Patients with Miller Class I or II gingival recession on the buccal aspect, with or without dentin hypersensitivity or aesthetic concerns, and a desire for surgical treatment. The cementoenamel junction (CEJ) should be visible, and in cases where the facial CEJ cannot be identified, the method outlined by Zucchelli et al. (2006) should be followed (if the facial CEJ cannot be located, interdental soft tissue should be gently lifted with a probe to observe the angle at which the CEJ enters the interdental papilla). ? Non-vital teeth, teeth with caries, progressive non-carious lesions on the tooth surface, and absence of occlusal trauma. ? Probing depth (PD) = 3mm. ? Absence of systemic diseases and infectious diseases. ? No history of smoking, or if applicable, smoking cessation for more than 2 years. ? Patients with good compliance and satisfactory oral hygiene maintenance.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: ? Individuals with deep overbite (malocclusion); ? Pregnant individuals; ? Smokers; ? Gingival recession sites with caries; ? Non-compliant with scheduled follow-up appointments; ? History of root coverage procedure in the previous recession area; ? Occlusal trauma, bruxism (night teeth grinding); ? Poor compliance, inadequate oral hygiene control.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
probing depth,PD;clinical attachment level, CAL;recession height,RH;keratinized tissue width, KTW;the percentage of complete root coverage (CRC);

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
gingival thickness, GT;the percentage of mean root coverage (MRC);Surgical time;Root Coverage Esthetic Score (RES);Patient Satisfaction;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactChen Jun

Hunan Xiangya Stomatological Hospital Central South University

chenjun1222@csu.edu.cn+86 151 1633 3525

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026