FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of the oropharyngeal versus nasopharyngeal airways for painless fiberoptic bronchoscopy

Comparison of the oropharyngeal versus nasopharyngeal airways for painless fiberoptic bronchoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2400079589
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2024-01-08
Start date
2024-01-12
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-01-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

painless fiberoptic bronchoscopy (PFB) patients

Interventions

oropharyngeal airway (OA) with nasopharyngeal airway (NA) :patients with oropharyngeal airway (OA)
nasopharyngeal airway (NA) :patients with nasopharyngeal airway (NA)

Sponsors

The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 85 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria included: adult patients (18~85 years old), male or female; American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Class I-III..

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The exclusion criteria were: patients with severely loose teeth; a deviated nasal septum; nasal surgery history; patients with extremely severe obstructive ventilation dysfunction; those with oxygen saturation (SpO2) < 90% before anesthesia or respiratory failure. All patients enrolled met the criteria for fiberoptic bronchoscopy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
incidence of hypoxia;—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
awake time; adverse event;Minimum SpO2;—

Countries

CHINA

Contacts

Public ContactRuyi Luo

The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University

luoruyi@csu.edu.cn+86 139 7583 0321

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026