Skip to content

Comparison of diagnostic efficiency of magnetic-controlled capsule endoscopy and conventional capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: a prospective randomized controlled study

Comparison of diagnostic efficiency of magnetic-controlled capsule endoscopy and conventional capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: a prospective randomized controlled study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2300077575
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2023-11-13
Start date
2023-11-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-11-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

obscure gastrointestinal bleeding

Interventions

magnetic-controlled capsule endoscopy:In this group of patients, the capsule endoscopy was sent to the duodenum and the duodenum was observed by magnetic control. Then the magnetic control was not use
conventional capsule endoscopy:After swallowing conventional capsule endoscopy, the patients were performed according to the routine examination process, that is, there was no external force to contro

Sponsors

West China Hospital, Sichuan University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
15 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The following criteria must also be met: (1) Symptoms of gastrointestinal bleeding, including hematemesis (vomiting of coffee-like gastric contents or blood), melena, bloody stool and positive fecal occult blood (2)Esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy were negative, and abdominal CT did not suggest lesions suspected for gastrointestinal bleeding (e.g small intestinal stromal tumor, etc.)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion was required if any of the following criteria were met: (1) no informed consent was obtained (2) pregnant or lactating (3) suspected or known gastrointestinal obstruction, stenosis, sinus formation, or dysphagia (4) refusal or lack of surgical conditions (in case of capsule retention requiring surgical removal) (5) have MRI-incompatible intracorporeal metal or electrical implantable devices (e.g., pacemakers, cochlear implants, nerve stimulators, etc.) (6) inability to cooperate due to physical or mental illness (7) currently participating in other clinical studies

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
diagnosis efficiency;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Length of stay;Completion rate of total small bowel examination ;Capsule retention rate ;endoscopic intervention rates;transcatheter arterial embolization intervention rates;surgical intervention rates;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactXue Xiao

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University

xxuenk@gmail.com+86 159 8217 5701

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026