Skip to content

Comparative analysis of the clinical efficacy of shock wave and conventional physical therapy in the repair of supraspinatus tendon injury: a prospective, randomized, controlled study

Comparative analysis of the clinical efficacy of shock wave and conventional physical therapy in the repair of supraspinatus tendon injury: a prospective, randomized, controlled study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2300077386
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2023-11-07
Start date
2023-11-08
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

supraspinatus tendon injuries

Interventions

Group 1:Interferential electricity, ultrashort wave, warm heat therapy, 5 times a week for 6 weeks
Group 2:ESWT pressure was set at 2.0-3.5 bar, plus or minus as appropriate according to the participants tolerance level, and the frequency was fixed at 8 Hz with 2000 pulses at 7-day intervals for 6

Sponsors

Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age 18-65 years; 2. Unilateral shoulder pain lasting at least 4 weeks with limited or unrestricted shoulder range of motion (ROM); 3. A diagnosis of supraspinatus tendon injury or partial tear on a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan using contrast enhancement that reveals abnormal supraspinatus tendon morphology and changes in signal intensity; 4. Musculoskeletal ultrasonography confirming injury to the supraspinatus muscle on the affected side, while the contralateral side was unaffected; 5. No contraindications to ESWT and application of physical factor therapy; 6. Participants volunteered to participate in the study and signed and personally dated an informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Bilateral shoulder pain; 2. History of trauma to the shoulder; 3. Calcific tendonitis of the shoulder; 4. Total tear of the supraspinatus tendon; 5. Rotator cuff tear combined with other shoulder conditions such as fracture, dislocation, and nerve injury; 6. Previous localized injections; 7. Presence of other local conditions including active infection and active inflammation, having severe osteoporosis, neoplasms, hematologic disorders (bleeding and/or clotting disorders), cardiac pacemakers or defibrillators, pregnancy, sensory dysfunction, severe cognitive disorders, psychiatric disorders, and epilepsy; 8. Participants who do not wish to participate in this trial, have not signed an informed consent form and are undated by the participant.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Evaluation Scale (ASES Shoulder Rating Scale) score;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Active and passive shoulder mobility (abduction, flexion, external and internal rotation);Thickness of the supraspinatus tendon by musculoskeletal ultrasound;Subacromial distance by musculoskeletal ultrasound;Visual Analog Scoring Method (VAS);Treatment satisfaction;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactZheng Wang

Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

rehabilitationer_wz@sus.edu.cn+86 198 2123 1826

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026