FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of intra-pedicular accuracy and proximal facet joint violation between 5G remote robot-assisted and conventional robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw implantation in spine surgery: A prospective randomized controlled trial

Comparison of intra-pedicular accuracy and proximal facet joint violation between 5G remote robot-assisted and conventional robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw implantation in spine surgery: A prospective randomized controlled trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2300077290
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2023-11-03
Start date
2023-11-07
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-11-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spinal fracture

Interventions

5G remote robot group:Using 5G remote robot technology
Conventional robot group:Using conventional remote robot technology

Sponsors

The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Newly diagnosed thoracolumbar (T9-L3) fracture patient requiring screw fixation 2) Sign informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Severe osteoporosis 2) Old fractures 3) Severe pedicle deformities 4) Severe systemic diseases 5) Coagulation disorders 6) Pathological fractures 7) Patients with tuberculosis and tumors

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
accuracy of screw placement;—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
proximal facet joint violation;time of operation ;number of surgical revision due to malposition;bleeding volume during operation;—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactCailiang Shen

The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University

shencailiang@ahmu.edu.cn+86 139 5516 2616

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026