Comparative analysis of robot implantation accuracy under two registration methods: intraoral scanning and CBCT

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

ChiCTR

Registry ID

ChiCTR2300074971

Enrollment

Unknown

Registered

2023-08-22

Start date

2023-09-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2023-08-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

dentition defect

Interventions

experimental group:Using an intraoral scanner to complete robot registration

control group:Using CBCT to complete robot registration

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: include patients with dentition defects and who underwent robotic assisted implantation surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with insufficient stability, loose adjacent teeth or metal restorations, inability to cooperate with oral scanning, refusal to participate in the study, and other major diseases will be excluded from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
implant accuracy;	—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactChenjiang

Dental Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University

jiangchen@fjmu.edu.cn+86 131 7811 8511

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026