Skip to content

Comparison of Three Nutritional Assessment Methods Associated with the Prognostic Impact of Laryngeal Cancer

Comparison of Three Nutritional Assessment Methods Associated with the Prognostic Impact of Laryngeal Cancer

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2300074065
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2023-07-28
Start date
2023-01-18
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-07-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Laryngeal Cancer

Interventions

Case series:N/A

Sponsors

Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 100 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: (1) pathologically confirmed diagnosis; (2) previous tumor resection; (3) complete clinical records and follow-up data; (4) expected survival for more than 3 months; (5) Karnofsky functional status (KPS).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: (1) serious complications such as infection, pneumonia, skin ulcers, etc.; (2) cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic and renal insufficiency; (3) distant organ metastasis; (4) history of previous antitumor therapy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical examination, laboratory examination (blood routine, blood biochemistry);OS;DFS;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Imaging examination;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public Contactyihanxiao

Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital

168244951@qq.com+86 157 9104 5728

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026