Skip to content

The effect of different anesthesia induction methods on The effect of different anesthesia induction methods on the baseline of motor evoked potentials in spinal surgerymotor evoked potentials in spinal surgery

The effect of different anesthesia induction methods on The effect of different anesthesia induction methods on the baseline of motor evoked potentials in spinal surgerymotor evoked potentials in spinal surgery

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2300072361
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2023-06-12
Start date
2023-06-12
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-06-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

spinal surgery

Interventions

Propofol group (P group):After the patient enters the operation room, surface anesthesia is given to the throat, and sufentanil 0.3 µg/kg,propofol 2mg/kg, lidocaine 1mg/kg is sequentially administered
Sevoflurane group (S group):After the patient enters the room, surface anesthesia is administered to the throat, and sufentanil 0.3 is sequentially administered under BIS monitoring µ G/kg, Lidocaine

Sponsors

JiangSu XuZhou central hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 70 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Spinal surgery patients who require intraoperative neuroelectrophysiological monitoring 2) Age 18-70 years old 3) American Society of Anesthesiologists ASA classification I-II; 4) No obvious movement defects were found in the limbs during preoperative examination; 5) Patients willing to participate in this study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Pacemaker implantants; 2) Patients with peripheral neuropathy of the limbs; 3) Individuals with a history of epilepsy; 4) Patients with metal objects in their bodies; 5) Individuals with skull defects or other contraindications for neuroelectrophysiological monitoring; 6) Patients with limb dysfunction caused by sequential factors; 7) Individuals with extremely unstable electrophysiological signals caused by non patient factors such as machine interference; 8) Patients who are unwilling to join this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Success rate of MEP baseline monitoring;MEP sensitivity;MEP specificity;MEP false positive rate;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
JOA score;Anesthetic effect rating;Perioperative anesthesia and operation related complications;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactZheng Wei

JiangSu XuZhou central hospital

865695725@qq.com+86 180 5218 6695

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026