Skip to content

Robot-Assisted versus Conventional Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy in A Multicenter Cohort Study: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Robot-Assisted versus Conventional Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy in A Multicenter Cohort Study: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2300071905
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2023-05-29
Start date
2023-06-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-06-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bladder cancer

Interventions

Robot assisted radical cystectomy group:N/A

Sponsors

Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: (1) >18 years old; (2) Clinical stage Ta-T4a/N0-3/M0;

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: (1) Severe cardiovascular disease; (2) History of previous major abdominopelvic surgery; (3) Patients with distant metastases; (4) Medical history of malignancy in other organs.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Overall Survival;Recurrence-free Survival;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactJian Huang

Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University

huangj8@mail.sysu.edu.cn+86 20 3407 8447

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026