Skip to content

Comparison of spontaneous pushing and directed pushing during labour

A single-centre feasibility study, measuring the outcomes of spontaneous pushing and directed pushing on maternal and neonatal outcomes among women without epidural analgesia during the second stage of labour

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2300071178
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2023-05-06
Start date
2023-05-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-06-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Labour and birth

Interventions

Spontaneous pushing group:Spontaneous pushing during the second stage of labour

Sponsors

University of Technology Sydney
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. aged above 18; 2. gestation week of 37+ at birth; 3. singleton pregnancy, healthy fetus; 4. fetus in cephalic presentation; 5. no complications during labour

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. administered epidural analgesia; 2. any medical or obstetric complication affecting 2nd stage management; 3. unable to comply with guidance; 4. undergo Caesarean section during labour

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Feasibility outcomes: recruitment rates, retention rates, attendance of participants;Acceptability outcomes: women’s and midwives’ perspectives and acceptability of the intervention;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Efficacy outcomes: duration of second stage of labour, mode of birth, perineal laceration, episiotomy rates, Apgar score, admission to neonatal intensive care unit and neonatal resuscitation;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactKathleen M. Baird

University of Technology Sydney

Kathleen.Baird@uts.edu.au+61 95144451

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026